The world's most read coffee and espresso resource

There are great costs associated with Nespresso capsules and Keurig K-Cup pods, both in terms of the environmental impact and waste, and the actual cost of the coffee inside these capsules. Convenient? Of course. Good for the environment, your pocketbook, or your tastebuds? Definitely not. We research the facts, and present alternatives.

Share Article:

Coffee already has a fairly high carbon footprint. Some reports say that getting one pound of roasted coffee to your home counter results in roughly 11 pounds of carbon emissions into the atmosphere.

This surprising but very real fact highlights the environmental impact of the beverage we all love and have a real passion for. And this is before we consider the brewing method. In our fast-paced world, convenience often reigns supreme, and single-serve coffee makers like Nespresso and Keurig have become incredibly popular, offering a quick and easy way for literally millions of people to get their caffeine fix.

But this convenience comes at a cost, and it’s not just about the price tag on those little pods. Those little single serve “golden ticket’ packaged capsules are not only harming the environment but also draining our wallets. We’ve known this for a long, long time at CoffeeGeek, and the time was way overdue for another feature article on this subject, and exactly why these capsule systems should be avoided and/or discarded.

A Costly Cup of Convenience

Before we delve into the environmental impact, let’s address something that Nespresso would most likely wish you didn’t have any awareness of: the real cost of their capsules and coffee. Single-serve coffee pods are quite literally some of the most expensive regularly available coffee on the planet.

Nespresso: A Premium Price for a Tiny Amount of Coffee

Nespresso pods contain a small amount of coffee (which may surprise some people), with Original Line capsules holding between 5 grams for Espresso and 6 grams for Lungo varieties. Nespresso also offers Vertuo Line of capsules with varying amounts of coffee depending on the type of drink. For instance, Vertuo Espresso capsules contain 7 grams, Double Espresso capsules contain 10 grams, and “Long Coffee” capsules contain 12.5 grams. With prices for Original Line capsules ranging from $0.65 to $0.85 per pod, this translates to a staggering $52 to $76 per pound of coffee!

The more premium Vertuo lineup is even more expensive, with pods costing between $0.95 and $1.50 each, depending on the size and premium nature. Some of the premium 7g Vertuo capsules can cost $1.25 each, giving a per pound coffee cost of $81!

To put this all in perspective, the average cost of a pound of whole bean coffee is between $9 and $22. That means you could be paying three to almost eight times more for your coffee when using Nespresso pods.

Keurig K-Cups: Not as Pricey, but Still a Significant Cost

Keurig K-cups are generally less expensive than Nespresso pods, but they still add up. With prices ranging from $0.40 to $1.10 per pod, and each pod containing around 9 to 12 grams of coffee, the cost per pound of coffee can still be significantly higher than buying ground coffee. The range is between $21 a pound at the lowest, cheapest commodity coffee end, and $43 for the more premium, larger capsules.

To illustrate the cost differences, let’s compare the price per cup of various brewing methods:

Brewing MethodVolumesCoffee Cost, Single Beverage
Nespresso (Original Line)1.5oz (45ml)$0.65 – $0.85
Nespresso (Vertuo SIngle)1.5-7oz (45-250ml)$0.95-$1.50
Keurig K-Cup6-12oz (175-350ml)$0.40 – $1.10
Traditional Ground Coffee Pourover1.5-10oz (45-300ml)$0.17 – $0.42
Reusable Filter with Ground Coffee1.5-7oz (45-250ml)$0.10 – $0.25

As you can see, using single-serve pods can be significantly more expensive than traditional brewing methods or using reusable filters.

The Environmental Impact of Pods and Capsules

The environmental impact of single-use coffee pods has long been a major concern. Millions of these pods are discarded daily, with a staggering 56 billion ending up in landfills each year. To put that into perspective, if you were to lay these pods end-to-end, they would circle the Earth 57 times! Furthermore, it is estimated that 576,000 metric tons of coffee capsule waste are generated globally each year. The problem lies in the materials used to make these pods and the challenges associated with recycling them.

Nespresso’s Aluminum Wasteland

Nespresso pods are primarily made from aluminum, a material touted for its recyclability. However, the reality is far less rosy. While aluminum is technically infinitely recyclable, the recycling process for Nespresso pods isn’t straightforward. Each Nespresso capsule weighs approximately 3 grams when the coffee is removed. Fifty-six billion capsules translates to 168,000,000 kilograms of waste added to landfills annually. These pods often contain a mix of materials, including plastic and aluminum, along with leftover coffee grounds, making them difficult to process in standard recycling facilities.

Furthermore, the energy required to produce aluminum is significant, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and environmental damage. Even though Nespresso claims to use recycled aluminum in its pods, the overall environmental cost remains high.

Keurig K-Cups: A Plastic Predicament

While Nespresso relies on aluminum, Keurig K-cups present a different set of environmental concerns. Keurig K-cups were primarily made from plastic, which poses its own set of environmental challenges.

These non-biodegradable pods can take hundreds of years to break down in landfills, potentially releasing harmful chemicals into the surrounding environment. While Keurig has transitioned to using polypropylene, a recyclable plastic, the actual recycling rate remains disappointingly low. Many consumers are unaware of the proper recycling procedures, which involve peeling off the lid, emptying the coffee grounds, and ensuring their local recycling facilities accept this type of plastic.

Recycling Challenges: A Reality Check

Both Nespresso and Keurig have implemented recycling programs, but their effectiveness is questionable. Nespresso claims a global recycling rate of 32%, while independent sources suggest a much lower rate, closer to 5% (Youtube link). Nespresso’s own claims are hard to swallow, but even if the 32% claim is true, that still means the majority – billions and billions – of their capsules end up in landfills every year.

Keurig, despite claiming that all its K-Cup pods are recyclable, has faced scrutiny for misleading consumers about the actual recyclability of their pods. Keurig acknowledges that not all recycling facilities accept their pods and encourages consumers to check with their local facilities. The truth is that a significant portion of both Nespresso and Keurig pods still end up in landfills, contributing to the growing problem of plastic and waste pollution.

Both Keurig and Nespresso seemingly ignore a very real circumstance here: people buy their products and use their capsules and pods because of convenience. All the extra work they expect their customers to do – rinse out the capsules of any coffee residue, peel off lids, sort the capsules very specifically in the recycling bins, and in many cases, actually transport the capsules and pods to specific recycling centers – in order to claim their products are recyclable and are being recycled?

This is clearly, and obviously not happening. If all their customers did this, every convenience benefit of pods and capsules would cease to exist.

Alternatives for a Better Environment

The good news is that there are alternatives to single-serve coffee pods and capsules that are both environmentally friendly and more affordable.

Reusable Options: A Sustainable Solution

Reusable nespresso-compatible capsules and refillable k-cup pods are the most obvious way to go, if consumers still want the convenience of that Nespresso or K-Cup machine. They do eliminate all the non-recyclable waste, and will save people a lot of money, long term. These options allow people to use their own coffee grounds, giving them control over both the quality and the cost of the coffee.

There is a loss here though: convenience. Again, the number one reason why so many Nespresso and K-Cup machines are sold is convenience. If you go reusable and refillable, this means at the very least buying pre-ground coffee and filling the pods yourself, which takes additional time. If you would prefer even better coffee, there is also the expense of a grinder to consider.

Eco-Friendly Pods: Compostable and Sustainable

Several brands now offer compostable coffee pods made from plant-based materials. These pods break down naturally, reducing their environmental impact. 

Some popular eco-friendly pod options include:

  • Bluestone Lane: Offers compostable Nespresso-compatible pods made with renewable and plant-based materials. Their Coastal Capsule Collection features a variety of blends, including their signature Maverick blend.
  • San Francisco Bay: Offers compostable K-Cup-compatible pods in a variety of blends, including French Roast, Breakfast Blend, and Fog Chaser. They are committed to sustainable practices and offer one of the largest selections of compostable pods.
  • Mississippi Mud: Offers compostable K-Cup-compatible pods with 40% more coffee than average pods, ensuring a bolder and more flavorful cup. Their pods are nitrogen-flushed for maximum freshness and are compatible with most K-Cup brewers.
  • Truck Stop Organics: Offers compostable K-Cup-compatible pods filled with organic, 100% Arabica coffee. They are committed to using sustainable packaging, including environmentally friendly shrink wrap.

NB, none of these vendors are CoffeeGeek supporters, and only one (San Francisco Bay) is our Amazon affiliate link.

Traditional Brewing Methods: A Classic Choice

We wouldn’t be CoffeeGeek if we did not stress traditional brewing methods as an alternative. 

The simple French press, with four simple steps of add coffee, add water, wait 4 minutes, then press down, is one of the most convenient brew methods around today. Cleanup is simple too: just use a spatula to run all the grounds out into a compost bin, give everything a rinse, and you’re done.

In some simple cases, pourover is even easier. A device like the OXO Single Serve Dripper takes even the need for a gooseneck kettle away: insert paper filter, add coffee, put the reservoir on top, and add water to the measured lines (from 6 to 12oz). Put the lid on, walk away, come back 3 minutes later to a brewed cup. Dispose the coffee and paper filter into your compost bin, rinse the dripped, and you’re done, with a very delicious cup as a result.

There’s also single serve automated coffee brewers out there. De’Longhi makes an interesting machine called the True Brew, which has a water reservoir, and a touchscreen super-auto like approach to brewing traditional cups of coffee. It does everything with a single touch of a button: grinds, doses, heats the water, brews the coffee you selected, and ejects the spent grounds. You only need to clean it up a few times a week.

All these methods result in a much better tasting cup of coffee, and a much lower per cup cost, and the environmental impact is severely reduced.

The Future Could be Worse, or Better

The convenience of Nespresso and Keurig is not only obvious, but telling in the billions of capsules and pods sold annually. What’s not so obvious to some is that the environmental and financial costs associated with these single-serve systems are substantial. While these pods offer a quick and incredibly easy way to brew a basic cup of coffee (or some artificially flavored, sweetened coffee beverage), they contribute significantly to the growing problem of waste and pollution. Moreover, the cost per cup of coffee using these pods is shockingly high.

The increasing demand for single-serve coffee pods, with the global market projected to exceed $29 billion by 2025, raises concerns about the ever expanding environmental impact of this trend. The production of billions of pods, many of which end up in landfills, requires significant resources and energy, contributing to deforestation, water pollution, and biodiversity loss.

While both Nespresso and Keurig promote the recyclability of their pods, the actual recycling rates are significantly lower than what they claim. This highlights a gap between marketing and reality, and it underscores the need for greater transparency and consumer awareness regarding the environmental impact of single-serve coffee.

If you, or your workplace regularly use capsule and pod systems, the change in this environmental impact really does start with you. If you’ve invested in a Nespresso or K-Cup system for the home, take the first steps to using either the 100% compostable solutions we covered above, or invest in a dozen reusable capsules or pods, and start filling them yourself. The key change you need to make: stop buying the official consumables from Nespresso and Keurig.

Even better, really consider the easy brewing alternatives we highlighted. Possibly the ideal move on system for someone weaning themselves off a K-Cup device is the OXO Single Serve dripper. At under $20, it barely makes a dent in the wallet, and for now, just settle on a bi-weekly or weekly delivery of preground coffee. Even that will taste so much better than what’s coming out of those small pods.

Then move on to spending $70-$150 on a good starter coffee grinder, and buy your beans whole-bean. Your coffee taste experience will be next-level, I promise.

If your office is married to a single serve pod or capsule machine, the very first steps you could take is just not using it, and making your own coffee; once again, the OXO brewer could step in.

If your office is progressive and does care about environmental impact, start a discussion, using the research we provide with this article, to get a decision made for a change. A machine like the De’Longhi True Brew or similar machine might be a good solution in an office with less than 8 employees; bigger offices can find other environmentally friendly solutions.

Honestly, probably the best office solution is to go back to the tried and true auto drip coffee makers with thermal carafes. Sybo makes a commercial grade brewer that can do 72oz (2.2l) of coffee in each brew, and it’s under $225. Of course, the responsibility of keeping it clean, in working order, and producing a new brew every few hours will have to fall on someone’s task list, but in terms of the environment and impact it has, it is nothing compared to capsules and pods.

And the coffee will taste a lot better.

References and Further Reading

  1. The Environment Impact of Coffee Growing and Transportation – Carbon Click
  2. Nespresso vs Espresso Machine – The Real Cost Explained – The Matbakh
  3. How much is a cup of coffee at home vs. a coffee shop – Greenlight
  4. Are Coffee Capsules Bad for the Environment? – RISE Coffee Box
  5. Are Coffee Pods And Capsules Bad For The Environment? Statistics, Facts & Quotes – Greenmatch
  6. Plastic Pollution and the Environmental Impact of K-Cups – TAYST
  7. Coffee capsules: Brewing up an (in)convenient storm of waste – Mongabay
  8. The Problem with Nespresso Pods – Future Proof Youtube Channel,
  9. Keurig misled the public over claims its K-Cup pods are 100% recyclable, the SEC says – OPB
  10. Coffee Production and the Environment: A Look at Sustainability – Canyon Coffee Roasters

Zuzanna travels the world because of her job, and makes it a point to find the best cafes, best coffee, best espresso in every city, town, or village she visits.

Did you enjoy this article?
PLEASE CONSIDERSHARING IT:
photo credits:
Zuzanna Kaminiski
Guest Columnist

Zuzanna Kaminiski

Zuzanna travels the world because of her job, and makes it a point to find the best cafes, best coffee, best espresso in every city, town, or village she visits.
Connect with us on Social Media

Support CoffeeGeek

If you enjoy and learn from this resource, please consider making a one time or recurring donation to help support our work and fund purchases for future reviews.

Donate
donate via Paypal

One Response

  1. Not mentioned in the article is that Keurig coffeemakers themselves (I am unfamiliar with Nespresso) are cheaply made and necessitate replacement after only a few years, thus increasing the waste factor when using this type of product.

Other Recent Opinion Articles

The companies that make this website possible

CoffeeGeekSponsors