Our Valued Sponsor
OpinionsConsumer ReviewsGuides and How TosCoffeeGeek ReviewsResourcesForums
Regional: United States West
Economic Analysis of Kona Coffee Blends
Coffee Kids
Help folks who help folks in coffee producing nations.
coffeekids.org
 
Not Logged in: Log In to Postlog in
New Topics updated topics   New Posts new posts   Unanswered Posts new unanswered  
Search Discussion Board search   Discussion Board FAQ faq   Signup sign up  
Discussions > Regional > US West > Economic...  
view previous topic | view next topic | view all topics
Author Messages
kopepua
Senior Member
kopepua
Joined: 26 Jun 2002
Posts: 217
Location: Kona
Expertise: Professional

Grinder: yes-Bunn  G3
Drip: yes
Roaster: yes- fluid bed
Posted Tue Feb 16, 2010, 6:41pm
Subject: Economic Analysis of Kona Coffee Blends
 

“KONA COFFEE BLENDS” TAKE PROFITS FROM KONA COFFEE GROWERS, STUDY REPORTS


KAILUA KONA, HAWAII, February 16, 2010  - A new study on the “Economic Effects of Blending Kona Coffee” concludes that current Hawaii law transfers profit from independent Kona coffee growers to the large corporations that produce Kona coffee blend.  HRS 486-120.6 – a statute which authorizes use of the “Kona” name on packages of 90% foreign-grown coffee, is the legal loophole that blenders use to label their mostly foreign coffee with the Kona name, and the result is income flowing out of Hawaii into deep out-of-state corporate accounts.

The study was undertaken by Marvin Feldman, Ph.D. of the San Francisco-based firm of Resource Decisions.  Dr. Feldman analyzed and contrasted two polar cases - a Business as Usual  case and a No Blending case. The study's Executive Summary explains:

"Under the Business As Usual case -The analysis concludes that blenders gain up to $14.4 million in "economic rent" per year through the use of the Kona appellation on 10% Kona blends.  Kona coffee growers experience an economic loss that may be on the order or possibly greater than the benefit to the blenders.

Under the No Blending case-- The analysis shows an upper bound estimate of $14.4 million loss per year to the blenders and marketers of 10% Kona coffee blends, with a corresponding gain to growers that may equal or exceed that loss. The blenders’ loss in the No Blending case would be offset by the benefit of improving consumers’ perception of the quality of “Kona Coffee” by avoiding attaching that appellation to a product whose taste is indistinguishable from commodity coffee. "

The full text of the Feldman Study is HERE:  www.KonaCoffeeFarmers.org

In 2007, the Hawaii State Legislature made a factual finding that “existing labeling requirements for Kona coffee causes consumer fraud and confusion and degrades the ‘Kona coffee’ name” (Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 102, 2007). Now, the Feldman Study will focus the attention of the Hawaii State Legislature on the ECONOMIC damage  caused by this consumer fraud, confusion, and misuse of the Kona coffee name - damage not only to Kona coffee growers, but to the State's revenues as a whole.

"Hawaii needs to protect the economic interests of its farmers", stated Kona Coffee Farmers Association president Bruce Corker, “ and should provide the same types of protections for the “Kona Coffee” name as California provides for “Napa Valley Wines”, Idaho provides for “Idaho Potatoes”, and the State of Georgia provides for “Vidalia Onions.”

The Kona Coffee Farmers Association is a volunteer, non-profit, community-based organization of coffee farmers with the mission to promote and protect the economic interests of Kona coffee farmers who grow and sell 100% Kona coffee and to seek greater legal protection of the Kona coffee name.  

*****************
Thank you for reading this.  We of the Kona Coffee Farmers think it is an important document.

with aloha,
Cea
back to top
 View Profile Visit website Link to this post
view previous topic | view next topic | view all topics
Discussions > Regional > US West > Economic...  
New Topics updated topics   New Posts new posts   Unanswered Posts new unanswered     Search Discussion Board search   Discussion Board FAQ faq   Signup sign up  
Not Logged in: Log In to Postlog in
Discussions Quick Jump:
Symbols: New Posts= New Posts since your last visit      No New Posts= No New Posts since last visit     Go to most recent post= Newest post
Forum Rules:
No profanity, illegal acts or personal attacks will be tolerated in these discussion boards.
No commercial posting of any nature will be tolerated; only private sales by private individuals, in the "Buy and Sell" forum.
No SEO style postings will be tolerated. SEO related posts will result in immediate ban from CoffeeGeek.
No cross posting allowed - do not post your topic to more than one forum, nor repost a topic to the same forum.
Who Can Read The Forum? Anyone can read posts in these discussion boards.
Who Can Post New Topics? Any registered CoffeeGeek member can post new topics.
Who Can Post Replies? Any registered CoffeeGeek member can post replies.
Can Photos be posted? Anyone can post photos in their new topics or replies.
Who can change or delete posts? Any CoffeeGeek member can edit their own posts. Only moderators can delete posts.
Probationary Period: If you are a new signup for CoffeeGeek, you cannot promote, endorse, criticise or otherwise post an unsolicited endorsement for any company, product or service in your first five postings.
Rancilio Silvia - How to
Step by step guide for easy brewing and steaming with the Rancilio Silvia
www.seattlecoffeegear.com
Home | Opinions | Consumer Reviews | Guides & How Tos | CoffeeGeek Reviews | Resources | Forums | Contact Us
CoffeeGeek.com, CoffeeGeek, and Coffee Geek, along with all associated content & images are copyright ©2000-2014 by Mark Prince, all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Content, code, and images may not be reused without permission. Usage of this website signifies agreement with our Terms and Conditions. (0.158504962921)
Privacy Policy | Copyright Info | Terms and Conditions | CoffeeGeek Advertisers | RSS | Find us on Google+